To incorporate the principles that foster active learning, ask yourself these questions:
Real-world relevance
- Does the task mirror the kind of task performed in real world applications?
- How is this content useful or applied in the world?
- Does this content represent the worldview of the learner?
- What would be an example of this knowledge applied in the world?
Ill-defined problem
- Are students required to make decisions about how to complete the task?
- How can the goals for learning be framed around an existing problem that the learner investigates?
- How can this learning goal be framed around an investigation?
- Does this learning goal lend itself for inquiry?
Sustained investigation
- Do students work on the task for weeks rather than minutes or hours?
- Is the task presented as an overarching complex problem or as a series of small sub-steps?
- Is this subject matter complex and would benefit from a sustained investigation?
- What are the goals for learning and how can inquiry be used to reach that goal?
- What will be the product of this investigation be?
- What diagnostic and formative activities will scaffold and sustain the investigation?
Interdisciplinary perspective
- Are tasks and strategies relevant to other disciplines and broader knowledge?
- How does this outcome relate to other topics across disciplines?
- Are there any 21st Century themes: global awareness, environmental literacy, civic literacy, etc that this outcome can support and connect to?
- Would the lens of another discipline aid the understanding of this outcome?
- Does this subject matter / problem lend itself to be investigated across disciplines?
Collaborative construction of knowledge
- Are students able to collaborate rather than simply cooperate on tasks?
- Are grades given for group effort rather than individual effort?
- Do the learning outcomes lend themselves to collaboration?
- Does this outcome require that soft skills are fostered?
- Are more knowledgeable students able to assist with coaching?
- Does the learning environment allow access to other learners at various stages of expertise?
- Would this learning outcome benefit from working with others and hearing diverse perspectives?
- Are more knowledgeable students able to assist with coaching?
Reflection / self-assessment
- How can learners connect what they already know with what they are learning?
- How can learners self assess their understanding?
- How can learners track their growing understanding?
- Can students compare their thoughts and ideas to experts, teachers, guides, and to other students?
- Do learners work in collaborative groups that enable discussion and social reflection?
- How can learner communicate his / her understanding?
- What stereotypes, misconceptions might exist around this subject that need to be dispelled through reflection?
Articulation
- Does the task require students to discuss and articulate beliefs and growing understanding?
- Does the task enable presentation and defense of arguments?
Integrated assessment
- Is the assessment of learning consistent with the learning goals?
- What type of project would allow the learner to investigate this subject matter?
- Can smaller (diagnostic and formative) learning activities be scaffolded into this larger assessment?
- Does the assessment go beyond an academic task and have value in its own right?
Polished products
- Are products or performances polished and refined rather than incomplete or rushed drafts?
- What product can the learner create that demonstrates his understanding of this outcome?
- Can developing a product around this outcome help the learner deepen her understanding around this topic?
- Are students assessed on the product of the investigation, rather than by separate testing?
Multiple interpretations and outcomes
- Does this outcome encourage choice and application of unique approaches and diverse solutions?
- Does this outcome benefit from being explored from multiple perspectives?
- Are there multiple assessment measures rather than a single measure?
Multiple sources and perspectives
- Are students able to choose information from a variety of inputs, including relevant and irrelevant sources?
- Are students able to explore issues from different points of view?
- Are students able to use the learning resources and materials for multiple purposes?
- What primary/secondary resources exist that the learner can use to investigate this content?
- Who are my students? What perspectives do they bring?
- What perspectives does the content expose my students to?
- What perspectives are worth exploring?
Learner relevance
- Who is being taught?
- Why should the learner care about this?
- What does the learner already know about this subject?
- How do the learning goals relate to what the learner knows?
- How does the learning goals resonate with the learner's culture?
- What learning tasks would make these learning goals relevant to the learner?
- How can I assess the learners prior knowledge and skills to scaffold understanding?
- How might learning tasks need to change for students with differing sets of prior skills and knowledge?
References
Darling-Hammond, L., Barron, B., Pearson, P. D., Schoenfeld, A. H., Stage, E. K., Zimmerman, T. D., ... & Tilson, J. L. (2015). Powerful learning: What we know about teaching for understanding. John Wiley & Sons.
Herrington, J., Reeves, T. C., & Oliver, R. (2010). A practical guide to authentic e-learning. Routledge.Lombardi, M. , Oblinger, D. (2007) Authentic Learning for the 21st Century: An Overview.
Reilly, C., & Reeves, T. C. (2022). Refining active learning design principles through design-based research. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14697874221096140.